Main Page Content
Keyword Or Trademark Beware Of Ppc Poachers
Posted on 16 Feb 2005
in
by troy janisch (ideahamster)
Rated 3.64 (Ratings: 2)
Want more?
When it comes to online advertising, one of the tools your competitor has may be your company's name, trademark or service mark. Google and Overture allow advertisers to purchase company and product names and federally registered marks as keywords in pay-per-click campaigns. This allows companies to poach potential customers from their competition by having their ads appear whenever a consumer searches for a competitor by name. The practice also saves competitors money because a competitor's name can be less expensive and better targeted than campaigns that use general terms. For example, I recently priced the cost of "Home Insurance" as a keyword at $9.85 per click. By contrast, "American Family Insurance" was $9 per click. The name of my local insurance agent's company was $.05 per click. Trademark owners have begun to challenge Google and Overture with the legality of selling their brand names to its competitors. In 2004, Geico auto insurance challenged Google and Overture for the practice with mixed results. Overture settled with Geico out of court. When the case against Google was heard, district court judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Va., granted Google's motion to dismiss the complaint, saying there wasn't enough evidence of trademark infringement by ads triggered by keywords where the ads do not contain the Geico mark. Marjory Stewart, a Milwaukee-based intellectual property and business law attorney, said the Geico/Google case is one that will involve deft discernment of trademark law.
What looks like a victory for Google after the early part of the decision of the court, may include liability on the finer points of trademark law.She said.
A company can be held vicariously liable for trademark infringement if it has the right to control someone else downstream or does control them and that party infringes on another's mark. Some of the results in the Geico case involved sites that used the GEICO mark without Geico's permission. That's a problem.She said that it is possible for companies like Google and Overture to be held liable for
contributory infringementif they intentionally induced another company to engage in infringing conduct. Or, if they fail to take reasonable precautions against another company's infringement if it can be reasonable anticipated. It's even more likely, she said, that advertisers using the practice may be held responsible. The district court held that where competitors' ads come up on the Google results page as a result of such keyword links, and these result pages do display the GEICO trademarks in a manner which is likely to cause confusion, that it can constitute trademark infringement on the part of the advertiser-- at least on the part of the advertiser. Businesses need to be wary of using a competitor's name to promote their own business and aware of how competitors may be infringing on their brands and trademarks.